Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
RPerry300WM, pop r, jellyworker, slugtooth, Sineypem
105929 Registered Users
Top Posters
TexDawg 86367
hopalong 78625
Pilothawk 75181
JDavis7873® 67382
John175 ® 65087
FattyMcButterpants 60793
Derek 🐝 58510
Tritonman 57653
LoneStarSon® 53416
SkeeterRonnie 53015
facebook
Forum Stats
105929 Members
60 Forums
855010 Topics
12174365 Posts

Max Online: 36273 @ 01/23/13 02:34 PM
Topic Options
#12326486 - 07/06/17 09:31 AM Brush Pile vs Submerged timber
Sandblaster Offline
Angler

Registered: 09/06/11
Posts: 297
Loc: Lake Lavon
This is one of those questions that has probably been asked several times before but what is the difference between a brush pile and submerged timber?
I'm guessing submerged timber is exactly that a tree that is underwater but then I guess the real question is what is a brush pile? What does it look like out of the water?

Thanks for any input?
_________________________
"It has been said that the Lord does not count the days spent fishing against your total allotment."

Top
#12326495 - 07/06/17 09:36 AM Re: Brush Pile vs Submerged timber [Re: Sandblaster]
Sangelle Offline
Angler

Registered: 05/20/12
Posts: 405
Loc: Flower Mound,tx
Submerged timber is usually thought to be standing or fallen whereas brush piles are man made to resemble a natural lay down or standing timber.

Top
#12326518 - 07/06/17 09:52 AM Re: Brush Pile vs Submerged timber [Re: Sandblaster]
fishin'aholic2 Online   content
TFF Guru

Registered: 11/08/07
Posts: 13245
Loc: Irving, Texas
They are pretty much the same. The only difference is that submerged timber typically has older larger limbs and usually come up off of the bottom a good ways while brushpiles tend to have more small limbs and are usually closer to the bottom. IMO, Submerged timber tends to spread the fish out more as they cover more area than brush will.
_________________________

Text Joey at 817-897-1384 for great rod and rod repair rates!

www.youtube.com/KIDKRAPPIE

Top
#12326524 - 07/06/17 09:55 AM Re: Brush Pile vs Submerged timber [Re: Sandblaster]
SLABXPRESS Offline
Extreme Angler

Registered: 05/17/02
Posts: 1967
Loc: Teague/Lewisville, Texas
What they said...
IMHO: Timber usually holds fewer but better fish. BPs, especially if large enough, will hold better numbers with lots of dinks.
If I'm filling the freezer, I'm hitting BPs. If I'm going for big tourney fish, I'm hitting timber.
_________________________

Top
#12327337 - 07/06/17 08:14 PM Re: Brush Pile vs Submerged timber [Re: Sandblaster]
Sandblaster Offline
Angler

Registered: 09/06/11
Posts: 297
Loc: Lake Lavon
Thanks
_________________________
"It has been said that the Lord does not count the days spent fishing against your total allotment."

Top
#12327700 - 07/07/17 05:44 AM Re: Brush Pile vs Submerged timber [Re: Sandblaster]
Gamblinman Online   content
Extreme Angler

Registered: 11/26/02
Posts: 2776
Loc: Yantis, TX
submerged timber does damage to fiberglass boats and lower units. Brushpiles, not so much.
_________________________
Texas Crappie Posse

Top
#12328307 - 07/07/17 12:33 PM Re: Brush Pile vs Submerged timber [Re: Sandblaster]
Ben Ther Offline
Outdoorsman

Registered: 10/22/05
Posts: 205
Loc: Kennedale, texas
good point Gamblinman

Top
#12328598 - 07/07/17 03:40 PM Re: Brush Pile vs Submerged timber [Re: Sandblaster]
Crappie Cat Online   content
Pro Angler

Registered: 01/24/03
Posts: 900
Loc: Little Elm
Imho the brush piles IN the timber will have
a lot more active fish..
_________________________



Top



© 1998-2017 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide