Main Menu
Newest Members
Basser57, Triston Bowden, hochatownfriend, Longhorns34, Devil Fire Fish
107126 Registered Users
Top Posters
TexDawg 87886
hopalong 78878
Pilothawk 76060
JDavis7873® 67389
John175® 66469
FattyMcButterpants 60846
Derek 🐝 59598
Tritonman 57891
LoneStarSon® 54174
SkeeterRonnie 53242
Forum Stats
107126 Members
60 Forums
821143 Topics
10382708 Posts

Max Online: 36273 @ 01/23/13 02:34 PM
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
#12017040 - 01/02/17 08:46 PM Re: Screen Size on Your Depth Finder? [Re: ben_beyer]
C.M. Offline

Registered: 09/09/16
Posts: 181
Originally Posted By: ben_beyer
I bought a Raymarine Dragonfly 7 today.

I've been doing some research and it came down to between that one and a Humminbird Helix 7. Nothing wrong with the Helix for sure but I think the Dragonfly will fit my needs for what I am wanting to do.

Good call. Their down imaging is the best (for that price range) and once you find your structure -- there is very little need for Helix'es side imaging.

#12019632 - 01/04/17 10:06 AM Re: Screen Size on Your Depth Finder? [Re: ben_beyer]
Bug-e Online   content
Pro Angler

Registered: 09/16/09
Posts: 569
Loc: College Station, TX
I have a Mark 4 DSI. My next sonar will have the biggest screen I can afford. Luckily relatively new used larger used units are getting cheaper as bass boat guys upgrade to latest units. I think I'm going that route.

#12023489 - 01/06/17 06:01 AM Re: Screen Size on Your Depth Finder? [Re: C.M.]
pelican Offline
Extreme Angler

Registered: 08/27/11
Posts: 2483
Loc: Grapevine
While you're looking for structure with DI & Sonar I'll be catching, also DI & Sonar have Big limitations in shallow water. With that said, I know a guy that only has DI & Sonar and he catches more fish than anyone else I know, I hope he never get SI.

I've never been good, But I've been Lucky!
I don't Lie or Exaggerate, but sometimes I remember BIG!

#12026616 - 01/07/17 06:35 PM Re: Screen Size on Your Depth Finder? [Re: RBDavis3591]
kickingback Offline
Pro Angler

Registered: 08/13/13
Posts: 898
Loc: Texas
Originally Posted By: RBDavis3591
Originally Posted By: kickingback
I disagree as the "yak" has limited area and space and the larger units can get in the way at times. Being a minimalist is always better in a yak. One dunk with a flip over and you can kiss that $1000 unit goodbye! Spend the big bucks if you have them but be forewarned.
From the Humminbird web site:
Humminbird products typically have an IP (Ingress Protection Rating) rating of IPX7. If a product is not IPX7, it will be indicated as such in the product specification section of that model in the Product section of our web site.

This is a tested and rated measurement that indicates the degree of of protection provided against the intrusion of dust, accidental contact and water. Equipment having this rating must be able to withstand submersion in water to a maximum depth of one meter for 30 minutes.

While I do not intend to test their claim Humminbird units, if used correctly, will not stop working in a flip over.

The maximum size of the unit depends on the size of the kayak. I have a Helix 5 on my kayak and where I have it installed increasing the size of the unit would not impact my fishing or paddling.

I'm talking saltwater and those little doors for your cards are not always sealed. Salt makes the difference.
Go ahead. Your dollar.
USAF Retired and Fishing!

Page 2 of 2 < 1 2

© 1998-2017 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide