texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
TraeMartin, Power-Pole CS, T-Rigger, JoeGoes, EcKo
119150 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
hopalong 120,579
TexDawg 119,518
Bigbob_FTW 94,889
John175☮ 85,892
Pilothawk 83,260
Bob Davis 81,483
Mark Perry 72,289
Derek ðŸ 68,312
JDavis7873® 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,037,835
Posts13,935,321
Members144,150
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Side Imaging on bow finder? #11313919 12/31/15 03:32 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,610
3
361V Offline OP
TFF Celebrity
OP Offline
TFF Celebrity
3
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,610
Thinking about replacing my older 958 Humminbird. It's my front/bow finder w/trolling motor mounted transducer. Only have normal sonar and GPS mapping up front. How functional is SI on your front graph? How good are the images for SI on the Humminbirds with a trolling motor mounted transducer at trolling motor speeds? Also, do you have to mount a big SI transducer to the trolling motor like I have mounted to the transom? Thanks, 361v.

Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: Side Imagging on bow finder? [Re: 361V] #11313984 12/31/15 04:06 PM
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 163
hairball Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 163
I had one on my last boat mounted as you are considering and it sucked because the trolling Motor rotation distorted the view. Down imaging was cool.

Re: Side Imagging on bow finder? [Re: 361V] #11314108 12/31/15 04:44 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,684
R
RedRaider3933 Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
R
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,684
I don't think side imaging would be all that practical for a front graph as you typically aren't moving fast enough or in a semi-direct line to fully utilize it. I think down imaging, 360 imaging, and sonar are much more appropriate and effective.

Last edited by RedRaider3933; 12/31/15 04:44 PM.

Go Tech
Re: Side Imagging on bow finder? [Re: 361V] #11314129 12/31/15 04:53 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 486
E
etexbasser Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
E
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 486
I use side imaging on the front of my boat and I use quit a lot. I get no disturbance from the trolling motor and I am using the transducer that came in the box with it. I use it to find brush piles and I get in the middle of creeks and watch the banks as I troll the creek. I am very satisfied with mine on front. I spend most of the time in my boat up front anyway.

Just my thoughts.

later...don


Don Chumley
If I ain't fishing, I ain't happy.
But mostly I'm happy.
I love being retired, the check is in the mail.
Mt. 6:33
Re: Side Imagging on bow finder? [Re: 361V] #11314588 12/31/15 08:03 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 631
Mayo Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 631
SI would be a nice option but not a necessity. You're going to use SI mostly when you're at the console going from area to area and making your waypoints in the process. You definitely without a doubt want DI at the bow however. It quickly helps decipher what's below because traditional sonar doesn't easily do that. I mostly use traditional sonar to tell me how big the fish are and what species.

Re: Side Imagging on bow finder? [Re: etexbasser] #11314633 12/31/15 08:23 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,090
W
Wayne P. Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Online Content
TFF Celebrity
W
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,090
Originally Posted By: etexbasser
I use side imaging on the front of my boat and I use quit a lot. I get no disturbance from the trolling motor and I am using the transducer that came in the box with it. I use it to find brush piles and I get in the middle of creeks and watch the banks as I troll the creek. I am very satisfied with mine on front. I spend most of the time in my boat up front anyway.

Just my thoughts.

later...don


I agree and do the same. I have been using Humminbird Side Imaging at the bow with the SI transducer on the trolling motor since my first SI unit purchase. Anyone that doesn't think it is a good application does not know how to operate a Humminbird Side Imaging unit fully.
If you have one of the other brands copies, you may not be pleased with that application, but the Humminbirds have the adjustments to have a fishing tool and a search tool.

I don't use DI for fishing at all. I prefer the wider coverage of SI. I take some DI screen shots for teaching purposes occasionally though.

This is the HDSI transducer on a Motor Guide Tour:


Last edited by Wayne P.; 12/31/15 08:26 PM.

Helix 12 CHIRP MEGA SI+ GPS G3N and G4N, 1198c SI, SOLIX 10 SI G3,
Helix 8 MEGA SI+ GPS G4N, SOLIX 12 SI and G3, MEGA 360, MEGA LIVE TL, RC-1
Re: Side Imagging on bow finder? [Re: 361V] #11314691 12/31/15 08:53 PM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,218
B.Hollingshead Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,218
I dont have one and dont see any reason to have one.
1. I run mine on the front split screen one is sonar off trolling motor and other is SI or DI off back of the boat.
2. Cost affectiveness
3. Running mine in split screen with the back, I can sit on a hump or creek channel and can tell when the front of the boat is on the hump and the back is off for boat positioing or the other way around.
4. 90% of the time the boat is not moving fast enough for SI on the trolling motor.


Branden Hollingshead

38-DD's and counting
Re: Side Imagging on bow finder? [Re: 361V] #11314807 12/31/15 09:51 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,018
S
Spiderman Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
S
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,018
I like having Side Imaging on the trolling motor. My setup is the same as Wayne's but it is a Fourtrexx. At 30% power it draws a perfect image.

Can't tell you how many times I've been trolling along and noticed a school of bass on the lake side of where I was sitting. It is pretty simple to cast to fish you see because your not moving that fast. Trolling is 2nd nature to me, so I spend most of my time casting & watching the screen.

The only thing to remember is to look at your screen before you change direction of the trolling motor. It is harder to figure out where they were once you have moved off in a different direction.


The Truth is six of the seven Dwarfs are not Happy!
Re: Side Imagging on bow finder? [Re: 361V] #11314866 12/31/15 10:22 PM
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 150
W
WmSmith Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
W
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 150
It's just like using side imagining in general, it takes some getting use too. But once you do you won't go fishing without it

Re: Side Imaging on bow finder? [Re: 361V] #11315880 01/01/16 02:30 PM
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 845
Rickmb Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 845
I have used SI on my TM for three years now. I would not go back.
I fish shallow a lot. I can use my SI all the way down to 2ft. By rotating my TM I can scan the bank ahead. I can scan flats with it. A good shallow water tool.
In deeper water I use it to stay on target and look for irregular features I may miss with just DI or 2D. It's a great way to see ledges and stay on them.
SI is about the only way to see under docks.


2018 Skeeter ZX250
2018 Yamaha 250 SHO
Re: Side Imaging on bow finder? [Re: 361V] #11315912 01/01/16 02:51 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 16,028
G
grout-scout Online Sleepy
TFF Guru
Online Sleepy
TFF Guru
G
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 16,028
Oh how I get so sick of people who don't have it say that it isn't useful. I tried doing the split transducer setup where I used the transom SI/DI and troller 2d, it was a pain in the rear having to turn around to make a cast after passing up everything you were missing. So I put a Lowrance LSS ducer on the troller and while I'll agree with Wayne that Hbird can dials theirs in better at slower speeds the Lowrance does just fine at snails pace.

If you can't see the objects in this picture then you are just not right in the head. Notice the speed was 0.2mph, I was drifting. If there had been a bush, tree or big rock then it would have shown just like that little dropoff does.



Re: Side Imaging on bow finder? [Re: 361V] #11316137 01/01/16 05:09 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 85,892
John175☮ Online Happy
MACHO MAN
Online Happy
MACHO MAN
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 85,892
I have a 998 on the front. Unless you zigzag all the time the side imaging is great.

It distorts when you turn but the benefits outweigh that known issue. I tend not to turn much on the trolling motor.


“Do not pray for easier lives. Pray to be stronger men.†-JFK
Re: Side Imaging on bow finder? [Re: 361V] #11316188 01/01/16 05:45 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,994
lakeforkfisherman Offline
Elliptical Mechanic
Offline
Elliptical Mechanic
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,994
I had one up front with a transducer shield saver. It was hard as heck to steer the Troller. The thing was like a big skate blade on the bottom of the Troller and was more of a pain than anything. Probably had a lot to do with my stone-age Minn Kota, but I took it off and sold it.


LET’S GO BRANDON!!!
Re: Side Imaging on bow finder? [Re: 361V] #11316558 01/01/16 09:22 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 631
Mayo Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 631
If I'm breaking down water and looking for fish activity I'm doing it from my console and not my TM. If I'm on my TM I've already done my homework and fishing because I saw something I liked.

I can cover a lot more water, mark cover and structure a lot more efficiently at the console than on my TM. I'm doing all this on a nice crisp clean picture right in front of my face and picking up all the little subtleties you wouldn't on a blurred screen that's 5'-6' away from you.

And trust me, just because I don't fish an area doesn't mean I'm not marking everything I see and making notes if necessary. Hey, each to their own but I only have one thing on my mind when I'm on my TM and that's ripping some lips.

Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3