Main Menu
Newest Members
TillerBC, I do what I want, Wetmyhook, FrontierMan, RiverMann
103529 Registered Users
Top Posters
TexDawg 84003
hopalong 75456
Pilothawk 74021
JDavis7873® 67380
John175 ® 61809
FattyMcButterpants 60637
Tritonman 57277
Derek 57014
SkeeterRonnie 52607
LoneStarSon® 52537
Forum Stats
103529 Members
61 Forums
868998 Topics
11402862 Posts

Max Online: 36273 @ 01/23/13 02:34 PM
Topic Options
#11273867 - 12/10/15 08:33 AM New Brush Piles
Lollygagger Offline

Registered: 03/31/14
Posts: 127
Loc: East Texas
If you were going to put in a brush pile in a lake (most likely an Oak tree limb or limbs), would it be better to have the limb laying on it's side on the bottom or having the limb standing vertical off the bottom or does it really matter? If vertical, it'd be in deep enough water that even if the lake got extremely low, it'd still be deep enough to not interfere with motor props or trolling motors.
"But God demonstrates His own for love for us in this: while we were still sinners, Christ died for us." (Romans 5:8)

#11274044 - 12/10/15 09:38 AM Re: New Brush Piles [Re: Lollygagger]
HooknSlabs35 Offline

Registered: 01/09/12
Posts: 133
Loc: Burleson, TX
I dropped a few before the summer and stood them straight up off of the bottom. They haven't produced very well. They are all cedars. I wish I would've tried one laying on its side. Also, it seems like the piles I find that aren't mine that appear to be laying on their side produce well.

#11274057 - 12/10/15 09:42 AM Re: New Brush Piles [Re: Lollygagger]
Gamblinman Online   content
Extreme Angler

Registered: 11/26/02
Posts: 2249
Loc: Yantis, TX
vertical...more surface area available.


#11274084 - 12/10/15 09:56 AM Re: New Brush Piles [Re: Gamblinman]
Kisndismis Offline

Registered: 01/14/09
Posts: 477
Loc: Kingwood, TX
I dropped our old pre-lit tree in a few weeks ago, it was a beech to get it all together and dropped in. Went back last weekend, perfect outline on the graph. I think those trees that you see that have fell over due to weak bank sand along the banks are perfect, plan to cut a couple, drag them to depression area and put a cinder block in. Too many branches is not good cover from what everyone says.
Watch it happen, make it happen, or say what the hell happened. Capt. Phil Harris F/V Cornelia Marie RIP

#11277952 - 12/12/15 11:28 AM Re: New Brush Piles [Re: Lollygagger]
sac-a-lait me Offline
Pro Angler

Registered: 02/07/06
Posts: 663
Loc: white settlement
Oak makes awesome piles I use it exclusively since most of my oaks have oak wilt. I have done both laying on its side and set up straight in a bucket. In my experience laying on its side holds more fish and I don't get hung up as much so it's a win/win. Oak lasts a LONG time. I'm still fishing piles 6 years old.

If you stand them up make them short and fat. It's always better to have more horizontal surface area than vertical. It's easier to find the pile and stay on it in windy conditions. Fish hide under the vertical ones vs on top of one's on their side also vertical takes ALOT more time to mix up concrete, keep them upright to set then they catch wind on the trip to the lake and on the lake. Tying a cinder block in the middle of a oak top takes all of 2 minutes.

Hope it helps.

Oh forgot to mention that you can lay ones on their side in shallower water
fishing without beer is like,.umm...hunting without beer!


© 1998-2016 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide