Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
jellyworker, slugtooth, Sineypem, KCK, radiomangrant
105927 Registered Users
Top Posters
TexDawg 86367
hopalong 78623
Pilothawk 75178
JDavis7873® 67382
John175 ® 65077
FattyMcButterpants 60793
Derek 🐝 58507
Tritonman 57649
LoneStarSon® 53414
SkeeterRonnie 53014
facebook
Forum Stats
105927 Members
60 Forums
854984 Topics
12173760 Posts

Max Online: 36273 @ 01/23/13 02:34 PM
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
#11000911 - 07/26/15 05:51 AM blue vs. channel for taste...
MBDLAW Offline
Outdoorsman

Registered: 12/10/14
Posts: 249
Loc: Cedar Creek, Texas
I started keeping some of the catfish i catch in the last few months and cooking them blackened cajun style- used to catch and release all so somewhat new to this - seems to me that the blues taste much better than the channel cats - just curious if this is common knowledge or just my preference (or the specific fish i caught) - all on cedar creek lake - not a huge difference, but if this is the norm i am going to release all channels - any experienced thoughts appreciated!!
_________________________
MBD

Top
#11000941 - 07/26/15 06:55 AM Re: blue vs. channel for taste... [Re: MBDLAW]
steveiam Online   content
TFF Celebrity

Registered: 09/19/09
Posts: 7049
Loc: Red Oak, Tx. (North Texas)
I hear this from others also--
When I do eat fish, I fry them and honestly I can't tell the difference--
The meat does look a bit different though, and I bet if you cook them another way you will tell a difference--
Just my 2 cents-
_________________________
This space currently held Hostage by photobucket-

Top
#11000975 - 07/26/15 07:47 AM Re: blue vs. channel for taste... [Re: MBDLAW]
HeavyLead Offline
Extreme Angler

Registered: 01/18/14
Posts: 1006
Loc: Rowlett, Texas
I really can't tell the difference. Maybe if I had them side by side I could.

Top
#11001053 - 07/26/15 08:43 AM Re: blue vs. channel for taste... [Re: MBDLAW]
Jimbo Offline
TFF Guru

Registered: 01/18/03
Posts: 15918
Loc: South Texas
What I've found is the meat isn't as oily on the blues and a little firmer.
The channels and this depends a lot on what lake you catch them from, but the channel meat tends to have that yellowish meat which is fat and a lot of people trim that off for obvious reasons.
I do prefer the smaller blues over the channels, but once the blues reach close to 10 pounds they can be a bit bland and the meat tends to be a bit coureser.
I've caught channels out of clear water lakes and you just can't beat the flavor of those cats.
That's just my opinion but it's what works for me!
_________________________
Just one more cast!


Top
#11001074 - 07/26/15 08:58 AM Re: blue vs. channel for taste... [Re: Jimbo]
banker-always fishing Online   content
TFF Guru

Registered: 07/12/10
Posts: 40831
Loc: Universal City Tx.
Originally Posted By: Jimbo
What I've found is the meat isn't as oily on the blues and a little firmer.
The channels and this depends a lot on what lake you catch them from, but the channel meat tends to have that yellowish meat which is fat and a lot of people trim that off for obvious reasons.
I do prefer the smaller blues over the channels, but once the blues reach close to 10 pounds they can be a bit bland and the meat tends to be a bit coureser.
I've caught channels out of clear water lakes and you just can't beat the flavor of those cats.
That's just my opinion but it's what works for me!




Plus #1. thumb
_________________________


IGFA World Record Rio Grande Cichlid. Lake Dunlap.

John 3:16


Top
#11001163 - 07/26/15 09:56 AM Re: blue vs. channel for taste... [Re: Jimbo]
TCK73 Online   content
Extreme Angler

Registered: 03/26/15
Posts: 2965
Loc: Jack County
Originally Posted By: Jimbo
What I've found is the meat isn't as oily on the blues and a little firmer.
The channels and this depends a lot on what lake you catch them from, but the channel meat tends to have that yellowish meat which is fat and a lot of people trim that off for obvious reasons.
I do prefer the smaller blues over the channels, but once the blues reach close to 10 pounds they can be a bit bland and the meat tends to be a bit coureser.
I've caught channels out of clear water lakes and you just can't beat the flavor of those cats.
That's just my opinion but it's what works for me!


That's pretty close to my findings. I prefer toe Blues up to 10 lbs or so, I release the larger ones. I find the texture of the Blues is more to my liking than channels. The Channels in the lakes I fish have the whole filet looking like a nuclear yellow mass of flesh, but they taste fine.

Top
#11001197 - 07/26/15 10:24 AM Re: blue vs. channel for taste... [Re: MBDLAW]
spazm09 Online   content
Extreme Angler

Registered: 04/16/09
Posts: 1799
Loc: Dallas, Tx
My guess is it has to with their diet. Blues eat mostly freshly dead or live fish, mullosks and crustaceans (maybe some insects for the smaller ones) but channels will eat absolutely anything they can put in their mouth. I have literally seen channels with a stomach full of mud. I was told it was from eating random things off the bottom.

As others mentioned, when deep fried, I can't really tell the difference but cooked any other way, I will always choose blues. The meat is just cleaner.

Top
#11001204 - 07/26/15 10:28 AM Re: blue vs. channel for taste... [Re: MBDLAW]
Muzzlebrake Offline
Extreme Angler

Registered: 12/26/14
Posts: 1528
Loc: Euless
I know this is about blues vs channels but a flathead beats them all.
My preference for taste is a 12 to 14" channel fried whole in yellow cornmeal, salt and nothing else. After that I prefer channels over blues simply for the meat texture.
Even a lowly little polywob bullhead is pretty good eating IMO if caught from clear water and better fare than a big blue.
A big channel is better than a big blue but smaller ones of both species are best for my taste buds.

If it's big enough to get on the hook is it big enough to go in the skillet?


Edited by Muzzlebrake (07/26/15 10:29 AM)
_________________________
From Genesis: "And God promised men that good and obedient wives would be found in all corners of the earth."

Then He made the earth round...and He laughed and laughed and laughed!


Top
#11001458 - 07/26/15 01:16 PM Re: blue vs. channel for taste... [Re: MBDLAW]
central texas Offline
Outdoorsman

Registered: 07/01/07
Posts: 149
Loc: Belton
I can't tell the difference , but favorite freshwater is crappie and saltwater flounder.
_________________________
Guns 2 worst enemies rust & politicians !

Top
#11001492 - 07/26/15 01:38 PM Re: blue vs. channel for taste... [Re: MBDLAW]
jackiekennedyfishingguide Online   content
TFF Team Angler

Registered: 06/20/02
Posts: 3056
Loc: Cedar Creek Lake
The body of water has a lot to do with how the fish taste along with how they are cleaned. I prefer blues over everything which includes crappie, flathead, and channels. Here again different people have different likes and dislikes. What one thinks is best others may think of it as so-so.
_________________________
903-603-3793
Clients or I have landed eight state record fish and eighteen water body records.
TPWD Elite Angler

jackiekennedyfishingguide


Top
#11001540 - 07/26/15 02:22 PM Re: blue vs. channel for taste... [Re: MBDLAW]
fmrmbmlm Online   content
Extreme Angler

Registered: 01/27/14
Posts: 1102
I like channels better. To me blues are like the tilapia you buy or get in a restaurant, only flavor is what you add. Channels taste like fish, but my experience is somewhat limited.

Top
#11001571 - 07/26/15 02:47 PM Re: blue vs. channel for taste... [Re: Jimbo]
taterpop Offline
Pro Angler

Registered: 01/30/13
Posts: 796
Originally Posted By: Jimbo
What I've found is the meat isn't as oily on the blues and a little firmer.
The channels and this depends a lot on what lake you catch them from, but the channel meat tends to have that yellowish meat which is fat and a lot of people trim that off for obvious reasons.
I do prefer the smaller blues over the channels, but once the blues reach close to 10 pounds they can be a bit bland and the meat tends to be a bit coureser.
I've caught channels out of clear water lakes and you just can't beat the flavor of those cats.
That's just my opinion but it's what works for me!
Hit the nail on the head!!

Top
#11001792 - 07/26/15 05:11 PM Re: blue vs. channel for taste... [Re: jackiekennedyfishingguide]
stubby77 Online   content
TFF Team Angler

Registered: 02/03/13
Posts: 3079
Originally Posted By: jackiekennedyfishingguide
The body of water has a lot to do with how the fish taste along with how they are cleaned. I prefer blues over everything which includes crappie, flathead, and channels. Here again different people have different likes and dislikes. What one thinks is best others may think of it as so-so.
nail it Jackie.
_________________________


Top
#11006847 - 07/29/15 03:05 AM Re: blue vs. channel for taste... [Re: jackiekennedyfishingguide]
MBDLAW Offline
Outdoorsman

Registered: 12/10/14
Posts: 249
Loc: Cedar Creek, Texas
thanks to all that replied - good information - i think i am going to stick with the blues unless frying them
_________________________
MBD

Top
#11006924 - 07/29/15 06:00 AM Re: blue vs. channel for taste... [Re: Jimbo]
Lee C Offline
Outdoorsman

Registered: 06/27/12
Posts: 26
Loc: N.E. Texas
+1
_________________________
ETX Catfish
God bless and tight lines.
Retirement plan: "Fishing full time instead of part time"!

Top
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >



© 1998-2017 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide