|
Forums59
Topics1,039,187
Posts13,960,641
Members144,194
| |
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
 83 hz vs 200hz
#10994597
07/23/15 01:10 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,901
cephusjoe
OP
Extreme Angler
|
|
OP
Extreme Angler
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,901 |
when drop shotting do ya'll use 83 or 200? I know 83 is smaller cone so a more precise beam, but it's so hard to find my ds on 83... 200 I can find it all day but in my mind I know it's not as accurate. What's yalls opinion?
Mcurtain county okie
|
|
|
Re: 83 hz vs 200hz
[Re: cephusjoe]
#10994816
07/23/15 02:31 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 40,978
CCTX
mapquest
|
|
mapquest
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 40,978 |
200khz. I keep my 2D on 200khz and downscan at 455khz (I just like how those two frequencies look). 83khz is actually the bigger cone. The lower the frequency, the wider the cone and the deeper the sound waves travel. I suppose, if I was dropshotting 150ft, I'd use 83khz. 
|
|
|
Re: 83 hz vs 200hz
[Re: cephusjoe]
#10994979
07/23/15 03:46 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,901
cephusjoe
OP
Extreme Angler
|
|
OP
Extreme Angler
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,901 |
Hhhmmm I went to a seminar and the hummingbird guy explained opposite... Smaller the cone 83 the tighter beam. Maybe I was misunderstood. I know at 200 I can see my ds easily and at 83 it a pain
Mcurtain county okie
|
|
|
Re: 83 hz vs 200hz
[Re: cephusjoe]
#10995017
07/23/15 04:09 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,014
jfdawson
Extreme Angler
|
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,014 |
You'll get a clearer picture if you keep the settings at 200/800 and turn noise rejection to OFF or low. if lowrance HDS set it to SHALLOW WATER. Here's another diagram: 
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|
![[Linked Image]](http://media.giphy.com/media/xUA7bcUCntaQseqKMo/200w.gif)