texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Brad2587, C Man, Cameron Gose, Jetskirentals512, Flashin Assassin Lures
119183 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
hopalong 121,070
TexDawg 119,800
Bigbob_FTW 95,347
John175☮ 85,918
Pilothawk 83,274
Bob Davis 82,396
Mark Perry 72,492
Derek 🐝 68,322
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,038,938
Posts13,955,886
Members144,183
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Richland Chambers 2859 ?? #10887265 06/01/15 04:14 PM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 360
J
J.T.69 Offline OP
Angler
OP Offline
Angler
J
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 360
How's the water at 2859? Muddy are fair for sand bass and hybrids! Was thinking about trying the old road bed tomorrow if water clarity is ok! Any hybrids caught off road bed or just Whites? Thanks for any info!!


Troy Foreman
G3 1860 deluxe Tunnel CC
Crappie fishing fool
Re: Richland Chambers 2859 ?? [Re: J.T.69] #10887290 06/01/15 04:20 PM
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 365
C
CenTexan Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
C
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 365
Was out yesterday and water clarity is not good. Its better toward the dam. Windsock and 309 was ok. Fishing was ok but has been better. The sandies are easy. The hybrid bite was ok but I ran into a lot of smaller fish. If you are catching white bass and hybrid in the same location, the hybrid tend to be smaller. 2859 is too murky as its fed by Chambers Creek and its pumping too much brown water in.

Re: Richland Chambers 2859 ?? [Re: J.T.69] #10887352 06/01/15 04:39 PM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 360
J
J.T.69 Offline OP
Angler
OP Offline
Angler
J
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 360
I was thinking that may be the case! Thanks!


Troy Foreman
G3 1860 deluxe Tunnel CC
Crappie fishing fool
Re: Richland Chambers 2859 ?? [Re: J.T.69] #10887390 06/01/15 04:49 PM
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 365
C
CenTexan Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
C
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 365
For the big Hybrids, fish the biggest shad you can catch. I mean up to the 8" plus shad. Windsock isn't always the best for numbers, but that's where I catch the big ones. And the cove on the west side of windsock is a good place to catch some big shad at daybreak. I catch decent fish on a 5" Sassy Shad but the big uns' prefer those big live shad.

Re: Richland Chambers 2859 ?? [Re: J.T.69] #10887483 06/01/15 05:15 PM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 360
J
J.T.69 Offline OP
Angler
OP Offline
Angler
J
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 360
What part of the lake is windsock located on? And Thanks for the info!


Troy Foreman
G3 1860 deluxe Tunnel CC
Crappie fishing fool
Re: Richland Chambers 2859 ?? [Re: J.T.69] #10887659 06/01/15 06:18 PM
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 365
C
CenTexan Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
C
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 365
Near the dam. The south end. There are two points close to the dam. Out from those points is a road bed that makes a great ledge. You can see in the pic marked by the stars. In this pic you can actually see the ledge by the light shaded area marked with the stars. It shows up good on a good sonar unit with a lake map card. You will see the boats fishing it. Good early and late.

Re: Richland Chambers 2859 ?? [Re: J.T.69] #10887938 06/01/15 08:00 PM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 360
J
J.T.69 Offline OP
Angler
OP Offline
Angler
J
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 360
Thanks CenTexan!


Troy Foreman
G3 1860 deluxe Tunnel CC
Crappie fishing fool
Re: Richland Chambers 2859 ?? [Re: J.T.69] #10888807 06/02/15 02:02 AM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 76
E
enjoying retirement Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
E
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 76
Was at the lake this morning, I tried by the water falls, and winsock I was not able to locate any fish. There were two guides in the area as well, they were having problems catching fish. Went over to the light house at the entrance of the cove there were three boats they were catching fish slabbing. However they were all under size. Went over to 309 where the three islands are (only two are above the water), caught big sand bass and had hybrids hitting as well. All of the hybrids were under size. All were caught trolling. Did not get my limit but had fun catching them sometimes two at a time.

Re: Richland Chambers 2859 ?? [Re: J.T.69] #10888874 06/02/15 02:20 AM
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 365
C
CenTexan Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
C
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 365
Go to the side of 309 closest to the dam. Since the lake has come up its been pretty good. I catch big fish at Windsock. I fish the windblown, west side, of the ledge. There are a couple spots where the water goes from 35 to 50 fow real sharp. That has been the ticket. I don't go to catch numbers though. The bite there will usually be slower but bigger. The bite was real good before the lake came up and right after. It has slowed some since. I have been catching more sand bass at the old 287 road bed and under 287 bridge. At the south end of the bridge in about 30 fow I have been finding sand bass pretty regular.

Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3