texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
jesseh413, Bassmanfx20, phvet, klmoore, Brad2587
119187 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
hopalong 121,166
TexDawg 119,857
Bigbob_FTW 95,450
John175☮ 85,924
Pilothawk 83,277
Bob Davis 82,629
Mark Perry 72,516
Derek 🐝 68,322
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,039,123
Posts13,959,582
Members144,187
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 14 of 17 1 2 12 13 14 15 16 17
Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report. [Re: La Perla Ranch] #10146437 07/18/14 01:11 PM
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 144
G
GregMKJr Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
G
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 144
Doc, in all your years with fish and deer throughout the industry in Texas, have you ever witnessed any rules violation or law violation or special favor given due to ones political position, TPWD, family connections, or financial contributions?

There seem to be a lot of people on here that are wary and distrustful of the government and all the money that flies around especially dealing with public and private property.

Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report. [Re: Chet] #10146441 07/18/14 01:12 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,103
Rob Lay Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,103
Originally Posted By: Chet
After hearing the stipulations the SAL folks have put on the "experiment" I have to change my position. I like others felt that the lake would be fished and fished for a fee. The fact that they agreed to this "no fishing" commercial or other quite frankly surprises me. Not believing that anything learned will be transferable to a major lake still makes me wonder about the use the state can put this to but hopefully some genetic ground can be broken. Will a 20lb. fish be grown, I doubt it and wonder if a fish from an experiment like this would be counted as a record anyway. Again hope some good data is gathered in the next 15 years.


I agree with you. I think this is a win-win for the state. The SAL program will learn a bunch. If they are able to remove fry and place elsewhere, then this could be a great investment for all of us!

However, from Gary's perspective isn't this like a plastic surgeon working on your young wife, but you have to agree only the surgeon can play with her for 15 years, then you get her back when you're 75 maybe with or without the modifications? It is good for the surgeon though!

Maybe not so bad, because Gary can still play with her when the surgeon does and he already has another girlfriend (La Perla).

Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report. [Re: La Perla Ranch] #10146481 07/18/14 01:26 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 121,166
hopalong Offline
Pescador Loco
Offline
Pescador Loco
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 121,166
I am gonna toss in my 12 cents worth here.
I went and read one of the articles, have read all the posts on here and one thing I see missing in most is NO BODY CAN FISH THIS LAKE FOR 15 YRS. so if this is just a study and some of the fry come back to public lakes (is my understanding) then wth is everyones problem with trying to improve our fisheries?

for mr. kirk to give back the mount and be pizzed at sal is ridiculous imo, they took 7000 fry from how many that hatched (he said 150,000) which is a minuscule amount and while they went to a private lake again NO ONE CAN FISH IT. so how is this a problem if it is simply for research?

I moved to fork in jan. and have only managed to catch 2 overs, neither were really all that fat either. like the rest of you I am after BIG fish and that is what I concentrate on so I see this as a positive if in the future public lakes benefit from the study of this private lake.
my personal best came from a private lake in oklahoma and would have been a state record but was not eligible due to being from private waters, this did not diminish my thrill of catching a 14.8 as it is still my pb and gave me a new goal to break this weight. hopefully I manage to do this on fork, maybe some of you will be able to in the future due to the information gathered from this.

back to lurking on this thread but dam man to get upset over 7000 fry being sent to a private lake for a study and no one being able to fish them out is pretty lame in my opinion.

Last edited by hopalong; 07/18/14 01:26 PM.

" Hop, set the hook"!
hopalong 99,999
TexDawg 99,999
FJB! not my president by a long shot!

lake fork FISHERMANS COVE MARINA/reservations - 903 474 7479
Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report. [Re: La Perla Ranch] #10146834 07/18/14 03:28 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,103
Rob Lay Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,103
FYI I was messaged that Frank Kirk really posted that, so appears legit. thanks.

Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report. [Re: La Perla Ranch] #10146893 07/18/14 03:48 PM
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,200
T
the skipper Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
T
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,200
The contract looks to me like all the Doc has to do is give TPWD a 24(maybe 48 I can't recall) hour notice before fishing the lake and they can fish whenever they feel the need. Not really any point to that but there seems to be a lot of that on this one.

Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report. [Re: hopalong] #10146905 07/18/14 03:51 PM
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 423
B
BassBucknBeer Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
B
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 423
Originally Posted By: hopalong


for mr. kirk to give back the mount and be pizzed at sal is ridiculous imo, they took 7000 fry from how many that hatched (he said 150,000) which is a minuscule amount and while they went to a private lake again NO ONE CAN FISH IT. so how is this a problem if it is simply for research?


back to lurking on this thread but dam man to get upset over 7000 fry being sent to a private lake for a study and no one being able to fish them out is pretty lame in my opinion.


I'm guessing Mr Kirk is upset because he feels that his contract With SAL program was broken. He agreed to 1% of HIS fry to be donated to "Research"

Think of it this way...If you had donated $150,000 to Purchase Fish to be put in lakes across the state and your contract stated that they could take 1% of that donation ($1500) for research, and instead of taking $1500, they took $7404.00 for "research", wouldn't you be upset??? It was a contract...

Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report. [Re: fouzman] #10146909 07/18/14 03:54 PM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 190
D
dudley44 Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
D
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 190
was referring to fish stocked by Arms Bait Co at Camelot

Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report. [Re: BassBucknBeer] #10146921 07/18/14 03:58 PM
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,239
B
bassdude10 Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
B
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,239
Originally Posted By: BassBucknBeer
Originally Posted By: hopalong


for mr. kirk to give back the mount and be pizzed at sal is ridiculous imo, they took 7000 fry from how many that hatched (he said 150,000) which is a minuscule amount and while they went to a private lake again NO ONE CAN FISH IT. so how is this a problem if it is simply for research?


back to lurking on this thread but dam man to get upset over 7000 fry being sent to a private lake for a study and no one being able to fish them out is pretty lame in my opinion.


I'm guessing Mr Kirk is upset because he feels that his contract With SAL program was broken. He agreed to 1% of HIS fry to be donated to "Research"

Think of it this way...If you had donated $150,000 to Purchase Fish to be put in lakes across the state and your contract stated that they could take 1% of that donation ($1500) for research, and instead of taking $1500, they took $7404.00 for "research", wouldn't you be upset??? It was a contract...

I'd be interested to hear if the contract said "1% of Frank Kirks SAL fry can be used for research," or "1% of all SAL fry can be used for research"

Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report. [Re: hopalong] #10146925 07/18/14 04:00 PM
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,589
'
'Ole Man Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
'
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,589
Originally Posted By: hopalong
I am gonna toss in my 12 cents worth here.
I went and read one of the articles, have read all the posts on here and one thing I see missing in most is NO BODY CAN FISH THIS LAKE FOR 15 YRS. so if this is just a study and some of the fry come back to public lakes (is my understanding) then wth is everyones problem with trying to improve our fisheries?

for mr. kirk to give back the mount and be pizzed at sal is ridiculous imo, they took 7000 fry from how many that hatched (he said 150,000) which is a minuscule amount and while they went to a private lake again NO ONE CAN FISH IT. so how is this a problem if it is simply for research?

I moved to fork in jan. and have only managed to catch 2 overs, neither were really all that fat either. like the rest of you I am after BIG fish and that is what I concentrate on so I see this as a positive if in the future public lakes benefit from the study of this private lake.
my personal best came from a private lake in oklahoma and would have been a state record but was not eligible due to being from private waters, this did not diminish my thrill of catching a 14.8 as it is still my pb and gave me a new goal to break this weight. hopefully I manage to do this on fork, maybe some of you will be able to in the future due to the information gathered from this.

back to lurking on this thread but dam man to get upset over 7000 fry being sent to a private lake for a study and no one being able to fish them out is pretty lame in my opinion.


The only post that makes sense to me. We will never be able to fish it, this is for research and IF it makes our great state a better fishery - go for it,


I am not making any decisions until the bourbon kicks in!
Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report. [Re: La Perla Ranch] #10146935 07/18/14 04:02 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,140
9094 Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,140
This is ridiculous. First off I'll bet Mr.Kirk didn't read one bit of the "contract". He caught a giant fish and called TPWD as fast as possible to get his name in the books and get his free mount.
Also I donate a lot of stuff and no matter how mad I got I could never un-donate it. Once donated it is the receiving parties property.
As far as La Perla lakes, get over it. Maybe this guy will unlock the last secret to growing 20lb bass here in Texas in our warm waters. Maybe he will discover that the prawns he is stocking will the do job and the state can start stocking giant prawns in our lakes and they will reproduce naturally and the SAL program will have to be bumped up from 13lbs to 16lbs because 13lbers will be commonplace. I do know this though, with maybe the exception of the early space program almost every major breakthrough has been at a university or a privately funded lab. I think Mr. Schwartz has as good or better a chance of accomplishing the goal as TPWD.
I now am deleting this silly thread and waiting to hear progress reports on just how giant he can raise a bass.

Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report. [Re: bassdude10] #10146962 07/18/14 04:11 PM
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,239
B
bassdude10 Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
B
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,239
Originally Posted By: bassdude10
Originally Posted By: BassBucknBeer
Originally Posted By: hopalong


for mr. kirk to give back the mount and be pizzed at sal is ridiculous imo, they took 7000 fry from how many that hatched (he said 150,000) which is a minuscule amount and while they went to a private lake again NO ONE CAN FISH IT. so how is this a problem if it is simply for research?


back to lurking on this thread but dam man to get upset over 7000 fry being sent to a private lake for a study and no one being able to fish them out is pretty lame in my opinion.


I'm guessing Mr Kirk is upset because he feels that his contract With SAL program was broken. He agreed to 1% of HIS fry to be donated to "Research"

Think of it this way...If you had donated $150,000 to Purchase Fish to be put in lakes across the state and your contract stated that they could take 1% of that donation ($1500) for research, and instead of taking $1500, they took $7404.00 for "research", wouldn't you be upset??? It was a contract...

I'd be interested to hear if the contract said "1% of Frank Kirks SAL fry can be used for research," or "1% of all SAL fry can be used for research"

Not that I care. I think TPWD should do pretty much whatever they want with the fry if they think they can learn something to help fishing in the state of Texas

Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report. [Re: bassdude10] #10146982 07/18/14 04:16 PM
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 423
B
BassBucknBeer Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
B
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 423
Originally Posted By: bassdude10
Originally Posted By: bassdude10
Originally Posted By: BassBucknBeer
Originally Posted By: hopalong


for mr. kirk to give back the mount and be pizzed at sal is ridiculous imo, they took 7000 fry from how many that hatched (he said 150,000) which is a minuscule amount and while they went to a private lake again NO ONE CAN FISH IT. so how is this a problem if it is simply for research?


back to lurking on this thread but dam man to get upset over 7000 fry being sent to a private lake for a study and no one being able to fish them out is pretty lame in my opinion.


I'm guessing Mr Kirk is upset because he feels that his contract With SAL program was broken. He agreed to 1% of HIS fry to be donated to "Research"

Think of it this way...If you had donated $150,000 to Purchase Fish to be put in lakes across the state and your contract stated that they could take 1% of that donation ($1500) for research, and instead of taking $1500, they took $7404.00 for "research", wouldn't you be upset??? It was a contract...

I'd be interested to hear if the contract said "1% of Frank Kirks SAL fry can be used for research," or "1% of all SAL fry can be used for research"

Not that I care. I think TPWD should do pretty much whatever they want with the fry if they think they can learn something to help fishing in the state of Texas


I don't disagree, but they should change their contract to say that. We need to remember that contributing to the SAL program is an option.

Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report. [Re: La Perla Ranch] #10147005 07/18/14 04:23 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,728
D
Douglas J Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
D
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,728
or perhaps grown men should not act like selfish little children over a stupid fish


that Kirk dude is a little worked up over something he can't control, what he can control is mishandling a huge fish and hoisting that beautiful fish around by her lower jaw in his release video


#MFGA
Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report. [Re: bassdude10] #10147086 07/18/14 04:52 PM
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 56
F
FrogFishing Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
F
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 56
Originally Posted By: bassdude10
Originally Posted By: bassdude10
Originally Posted By: BassBucknBeer
Originally Posted By: hopalong


for mr. kirk to give back the mount and be pizzed at sal is ridiculous imo, they took 7000 fry from how many that hatched (he said 150,000) which is a minuscule amount and while they went to a private lake again NO ONE CAN FISH IT. so how is this a problem if it is simply for research?


back to lurking on this thread but dam man to get upset over 7000 fry being sent to a private lake for a study and no one being able to fish them out is pretty lame in my opinion.



I'm guessing Mr Kirk is upset because he feels that his contract With SAL program was broken. He agreed to 1% of HIS fry to be donated to "Research"

Think of it this way...If you had donated $150,000 to Purchase Fish to be put in lakes across the state and your contract stated that they could take 1% of that donation ($1500) for research, and instead of taking $1500, they took $7404.00 for "research", wouldn't you be upset??? It was a contract...

I'd be interested to hear if the contract said "1% of Frank Kirks SAL fry can be used for research," or "1% of all SAL fry can be used for research"

Not that I care. I think TPWD should do pretty much whatever they want with the fry if they think they can learn something to help fishing in the state of Texas






Does any one have a copy of this contract that Kirk signed?

Last edited by FrogFishing; 07/18/14 04:57 PM.
Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report. [Re: bassdude10] #10147115 07/18/14 05:02 PM
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 423
B
BassBucknBeer Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
B
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 423
Originally Posted By: bassdude10

I'd be interested to hear if the contract said "1% of Frank Kirks SAL fry can be used for research," or "1% of all SAL fry can be used for research"

That is an interesting question. It looks like only 2 of the sharelunkers caught this year actually spawned...

From the sharelunker facebook pg:

"Two fish spawned. 552, Randall Claybourne's fish from Lake Fork, spawned once and produced 26,015 fry. 553, Frank Kirk's fish from lake Athens, spawned three times and produced 117,425 fry. Fingerlings will be shared out among all the lakes producing entries this past season."
A total of 143,440

Page 14 of 17 1 2 12 13 14 15 16 17
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3